Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Graffiti: Art, or Vandalism?

I thought I'd expand on the conversation/comments started by my last Post.

IMO, whether Graffiti is Art or Vandalism depends on the graffiti itself, and on the "canvas" that was used.

When we first moved into our townhouse our communal letterbox (that we shared with 6 neighbors) came with a piece of lumber across the top. About 3' wide, 12" tall, painted white, it proved an irresistible target, so I wasn't too surprised when I came home from work one day to see something unintelligible scribbled across it. But we'd been painting the house that past weekend so I happened to have a couple of cans of white paint in the garage, and as soon as I'd parked my car I was back out the front, paint & brush in hand.

When painted/written under a larger piece of work I could acknowledge that this:
is an artist's signature. But when it's scrawled in black marker across a letterbox it's nothing but senseless vandalism. I obliterated it with a coat of white paint (not this piece specifically).

A couple of days later it was back. Maybe the same Tagger, maybe not, I don't know; I lost the ability to read Scribble when I graduated from Kindergarten.

I painted over it again.

About a week went by before the Taggers struck again, and probably within hours of them scribbling their nonsense on my letterbox I'd once again erased it.

It was almost six months before they Tagged us again.

They were still around. I'd see their work up and down the street, on other letterboxes, For Sale signs, even spray painted on hedges, but for six months they left us alone. And when they finally did hit us I was back out there, painting over it again.

It didn't piss me off, in fact I got a smug sense of satisfaction by imagining the Tagger coming by later to admire his work, and seeing that his biggest Tag was already gone, just hours after he'd put it up.

That's Tagging. It's graffiti, and it's vandalism. It's exactly the same as your dog pissing on and marking every rock, tree & street sign when you take him for a walk.
"This is mine! And this is mine! Oh, this? This is mine, too! And this! It's mine as well!"

No, this letterbox is mine!

Now if the Taggers had shown a little bit of style and creativity, I might have left their work alone. If they'd done something like this:

or even this:

I'd have thought, "That's pretty cool! I like it!" and it could have stayed.

But when a dog takes a piss up against your letterbox it's only natural to grab your hose and clean it off. Or you piss right back, and you keep on doing that, and eventually the dog comes through saying, "This is mine! And this! And this, too! And...oh! This? No. This is yours."

7 comments:

Tesh said...

Nicely stated, Capn. I've seen some pretty impressive "graffiti art", but what you're calling tags (I think it's a great definition) are indeed just annoying and vandalism.

Joseph B. Hewitt IV said...

Now this guy is an artist:Banksy

I love two of the stories about his work. One where he is painting the wall in the West Bank and an old Palestinian man said his painting made the wall look beautiful. Banksy thanked him, only to be told: 'We don't want it to be beautiful, we hate this wall. Go home.

The second, which I can't find a link to, is where some people found some council workers doing something to one of his pieces. They made a comment and the workers admitted that they were actually touching up the work; because the council had gotten so many requests to keep them up they decided they were good for tourism in the area.

I also think he targets places with a bit of intelligence. In other words I don't see him coming by my house and tagging the side of it for no reason.

Cap'n John said...

Thanks, Joseph.

I just went to Banksy's website, and the picture on his main page of Thomas (the Tank Engine) being Tagged really made me LOL! :D

I think I'm going to peruse his site a little more.

Joseph B. Hewitt IV said...

He takes things down all the time. The actual story about him in the West Bank at the wall isn't there anymore.

He used to have clips of him putting up artwork in a museum which I loved. You see him (or somebody you can't identify) walking around in the museum with a big coat. Then he'd pull out a framed piece of art and stick it up on the wall complete with a plaque. There was even some commentary about how long the art remained on the wall before the museum realized it wasn't part of the exhibit and took it down. It's been awhile since I read it so the details are kinda blurry. The clip up there now is kinda bleh.

I also remember there being quite a lot more under his manifesto, which now just has a quote from Emo Philips.

Cap'n John said...

While Banksy does do some humorous stuff, he also has quite a few thought provoking pieces on his website, too.

Bone said...

So what would the dog equivalent of style and creativity be?

Cap'n John said...

A very good question, Bone. A High School buddy of mine used to have a dog that would only take a dump by backing up against a hedge or bush. He'd never squat on the grass, sidewalk, gutter, etc, it had to be against a bush, and he would always back himself up and push into the bush as much as he could.

I think that deserves some style & creativity points, or at least something for originality. I've never seen any other dog take a dump that way.